Welcome to the Sixth Annual WSC faculty conference. 2009 is the Year of Calvin and we're observing the 500th anniversary of Calvin's birth with a conference devoted to "Calvin's Legacy: Reforming the Church Today."

We're excited about the conference. It's sold out. We're expecting a full house tonight and tomorrow. I'm live blogging the conference tonight and tomorrow. There will be reports on the two plenary addresses tonight by Bob Godfrey and Steve Baugh. I'll post a summary of my talk tomorrow morning before I speak and will resume coverage during the Saturday addresses. There will be additional posts covering other interesting aspects of the conference.

We've set up a feature to allow you to ask questions. Simply click the link below to ask Dr. R. Scott Clark a question and if yours is selected, I'll post a reply in this space.

To start: Three Myths About Calvin

   Calvin ruled Geneva with an iron fist. Wrong. He wasn't a citizen until late in his life. He didn't vote. He was fired after only two years and sent packing unceremoniously. Do dictators get fired? To be sure, especially after he returned from exile his influence did grow considerably and he was probably the leading personality in the city by the 1550s. Nevertheless, the small city council (petit conseil) over ruled Calvin on at least two key issues. He wanted to observe the Lord's Supper weekly and he wanted to include an absolution or a declaration of pardon in the liturgy. Both of these should have been minor issues for a tyrant but he was unable to persuade the people and the civil leadership to let him do it. These failures to persuade suggest that Calvin did not have the sort of absolute authority that many people imagine. Indeed, at the end of his life, Calvin himself worried that not only was the Genevan Reformation a failure but that the entire episode might be coming to nothing.

   Calvin murdered Miguel Servetus. Wrong. To be sure Calvin did "rat him out" but only after the former showed up in Geneva, despite Calvin's warning of what the civil authorities would do to him and then Servetus appeared in church.

It was the 16th-century. All the magisterial Reformers agreed that the magistrate should not tolerate public heresy against the catholic faith. It was a crime against the civil code in most European cities and Genva was no exception. If the Protestant cities had not treated heresy as a civil crime, the Roman authories would have accused them of giving hospitality to heretics. They were condemned if they did and condemned if they didn't.

There's little doubt that Calvin thought that the civil magistrate should be able to put heretics to death, but the fact is that Calvin didn't put to death anyone, let alone Servetus. Further, judging by the period, Calvin was a piker. Two or three anti-Trinitarians were put to death in Heidelberg in 1570, over the objections of the magistrate, at the insistence of the ministers! Why all the outrage over Calvin and his one heretic and virtual silence over the exponentially greater crime in Heidelberg? Calvin's opponents then and now use the episonde as a way of shaming Calvin (and Calvinists). It's not really about history. It's about the politics of perception.

   Calvin bowled on the Sabbath. Nonsense. There's not a shred of historical evidence for this 19th-century myth. As a practical matter Calvin was far too busy every Sabbath doing what ministers do, preaching the gospel, administering the sacraments, attending to the needs of God's people, resting, eating, catechizing catechumens (students) and preaching the second service. The only folks who can imagine Calvin taking time to play at lawn bowling are folk who don't keep Calvin's hectic Sunday schedule. In fact this legend is a way to justify an anti-Puritan, anti-Sabbatarian viewpoint by attributing their view to a hero and thereby giving it rhetorical (not logical, exegetical, or theological) credibility.

The best way to see all the posts for this conference is to subscribe to the Live Feed via RSS found here.

More in a few minutes...

Ask Dr. R. Scott Clark a question about this post >>