On the Distinction Between Jesus' "Faith"
and the Justifying Faith of Sinners
by
Geerhardus Vos (1862-1949)
from "Heavenly-Mindedness" in Grace and
Glory:
Sermons Preached in the Chapel of Princeton Theological Seminary
(Edinburgh: Banner of Truth Trust, repr. 1994), 103-107.(The opening thoughts of his sermon "Heavenly-Mindedness"
based upon Hebrews 11:9-10)
The chapter from which our text is taken is preeminently the
chapter on faith. It illustrates the nature, power and effects
of this grace in a series of examples from sacred history. In
the context the prophecy of Habakkuk is quoted: 'The righteous
shall live by faith.' We remember that in the Epistles to the
Romans and Galatians also the same prophecy appears with prominence.
Abraham similarly figures there as the great example of faith.
In consequence one might easily be led to think that the development
of the idea of faith in these epistles and in our chapter moves
along identical lines. This would be only partially correct.
Although the two types of teaching are in perfect accord, and
touch each other at certain points, yet the angle of vision is
not the same.
In Romans and Galatians faith is in the main trust in the
grace of God, the instrument of justification, the channel through
which the vital influences flowing from Christ are received by
the believer. Here in Hebrews the conception is wider; faith
is 'the proving of things not seen, the assurance of things hoped
for'. It is the organ for apprehension of the unseen and future
realities, giving access to and contact with another world. It
is the hand stretched out through the vast distances of space
and time, whereby the Christian draws to himself the things far
beyond, so that they become actual to him. The earlier epistles
are not unfamiliar with this aspect of faith. Paul in 2 Corinthians
declares that for the present the Christian walks through a land
of faith and not of sight. And on the other hand this chapter
is not unfamiliar with the justifying function of faith, for
we are told of Noah, that he became heir of the righteousness
which is according to faith.
Nevertheless, taking the two representations as a whole, the
distinctness of the point of view in each should not be neglected.
It can be best appreciated by observing that, while in these
other writings Christ is the object of faith, the One towards
whom the sinner's trust is directed, here the Saviour is described
as himself exercising faith, in fact as the one perfect, ideal
believer. The writer exhorts his readers: 'Let us run with patience
the race that is set before us, looking unto Jesus the leader
and perfecter of our faith.' Faith in that other sense of specific
trust, through which a guilty sinner becomes just in the sight
of God, our Lord could not exercise, because he was sinless.
But the faith that is an assurance of things hoped for and a
proving of things not seen had a large place in his experience.
By very reason of the contrast between the higher world to which
he belonged and this dark lower world of suffering and death
to which he had surrendered himself it could not be otherwise
than that faith, as a projection of his soul into the unseen
and future, should have been the fundamental habit of the earthly
life of his human nature, and should have developed in him a
degree of intensity not attained elsewhere.
But, although, for the reason stated, in the unique case of
Jesus the two types of faith did not go together, they by no
means exclude each other in the mind of the Christian. For, after
all, justifying faith is but a special application in one particular
direction of the frame of mind here described. Among all the
realities of the invisible world, mediated to us by the disclosures
and promises of God, and to which our faith responds there is
none that more strongly calls into action this faculty for grasping
the unseen than the divine pronouncement through the gospel,
that, though sinners, we are righteous in the judgment of God.
That is not only the invisible, it seems the impossible; it is
the paradox of all paradoxes; it requires a unique energy of
believing; it is the supreme victory of faith over the apparent
reality of things; it credits God with calling the things that
are not as though they were; it penetrates more deeply into the
deity of God than any other act of faith.
What we read in this chapter about the various activities
and acts of faith in the lives of the Old Testament saints might
perhaps at first create the impression that the word 'faith'
is used in a looser sense, and that many things are attributed
to it not strictly belonging there on the author's own definition.
One might be inclined in more precise language to classify them
with other Christian graces. There is certainly large variety
of costume in the procession that is made to pass before our
eyes. The understanding that the worlds were framed out of nothing,
the ability to offer God an acceptable sacrifice, the experience
of translation unto God, the preparing of the ark, the responsiveness
to the call to leave one's country, the power to conceive seed
when past age, the willingness to sacrifice an only son, Joseph's
mention beforehand of the deliverance from Egypt, and his commandment
concerning his bones, the hiding of the child Moses, the choice
by Moses, when grown up, of the reproach of God's people in preference
to the treasures of Egypt, all this and more is represented as
belonging to the one rubric of faith. But let us not misunderstand
the writer. When he affirms that by faith all these things were
suffered and done, his idea is not that what is enumerated was
in each case the expression of faith. What he means is that in
the last analysis faith alone made possible every one of the
acts described, that as an underlying frame of mind it enabled
all these other graces to function, and to produce the rich fruitage
here set forth, the exercise of all these in the profound Christian
sense would have been impossible, if the saints had not had through
faith their eye firmly fixed on the unseen and promised world.
Whether the call was to believe or to follow, to do or to
bear, the obedience to it sprang not from any earth-fed sources
but from the infinite reservoir of strength stored up in the
mountain-land above. If Moses endured it was not due to the power
of resistance in his human frame, but because the weakness in
him was compensated by the vision of him who is invisible. If
Abraham, who had gladly received the promises, offered up his
only-begotten son, it was not because in heroic resignation he
steeled himself to obedience, but because through faith he saw
God as greater and stronger than the most inexorable physical
law of nature: 'For he accounted that God is able to raise up
even from the dead.' And so in all the other instances. Through
faith the powers of the higher world were placed at the disposal
of those whom this world threatened to overwhelm, and so the
miracle resulted that from weakness they were made strong. |
|
Disclaimer
The statements, views and opinions...more
Contact Information
Email Dr Clark: rsclark at wscal dot edu
760.480.8474
Office Hours:
Wed 10:40 AM-12:40 PM
Personal Links
Prof. Clark's Home Page
Bio
Syllabi
Heidelblog
Audio and Video
On the Writing of Essays
Class Handouts
Historical Theology
Systematic Theology
FV and NPP
Reformed Confessions
Covenant Theology
Exegetical Theology
Reformed Worship
Publications
Curriculum Vitae
Reviews
Practica
Recursos Reformados
|