It seems to me that one person who understood evangelism was the
apostle Paul—and this in the first century! In particular, we see
from his own example how he adapts his evangelism to the worldview
of his hearers. He modifies his approach to those who hold a
biblical worldview and those who do not. Paul understood that as an
ambassador in a foreign and hostile territory, he must find ways
into the core values, thought patterns, life principles—in short,
the worldview—of those who are being evangelized. The twenty-first
century witness must find bridges into the other frames of
reference, or no communication is possible.
Examples of Evangelism from the Apostle Paul: Acts 13 vs. Acts 17
From his own example, Paul demonstrates the difference between
witnessing to those who know the Bible storyline and have categories
for understanding the gospel, and those who have no clue about the
Biblical storyline of creation, fall, redemption, and consummation.
First, in Acts 13:16 41, we see Paul visiting a synagogue in
Pisidian Antioch. As you know, Paul often began his evangelism in a
new city by going to the Jewish synagogue where, as a traveling
rabbi or teacher, he would be given the honor and opportunity to
address those who gathered to learn from God’s Word, in this case,
the Hebrew Bible, otherwise known as the Old Testament.
Here in this setting, Paul would have instinctively recognized his
audience: Jews, Gentile proselytes to Judaism (circumcised), and
Godfearers (uncircumcised followers of Judaism). Each of these
groups were made up of people who would have been exposed to the Old
Testament—some of them from their childhood. Thus, these would be
the equivalent of those in our congregations that grew up in a
Christian home and church, hearing and learning Bible stories and
truths that helped establish a biblical worldview.
In this context, what does Paul do? Paul takes his hearers through
the Old Testament biblical storyline in order to prove that the
promise of the Messiah has been fulfilled in Jesus Christ. He
selectively chooses Old Testament quotes and argues that the
resurrection of Jesus is the fulfillment of biblical prophecies
about the Holy One in David's line “not seeing decay.” From there,
he then shows why Jesus had to die—so that our sins would be
forgiven and we would be declared righteous before a holy God. He
then ends his message with a warning of judgment as a result of
unbelief.
So, this is Paul’s message and method for evangelizing those who are
“churched” and have categories in place to make sense of the problem
of sin and the solution Jesus provides. What he does in Acts 17,
however, is something different. The content is essentially the
same, but the method is different.
In Acts 17:16-34 we read of Paul’s journey to Athens, specifically
his encounter with the philosophers gathered at the Areopagus. These
highly educated, intelligent Athenians have no clue about the
Biblical storyline, let alone who God is, who Adam is, Moses, or
David. They are biblically illiterate. His approach then, is
remarkably different and is instructive for us as we face an
audience of those who are unchurched and postmodern in their
outlook. What does Paul’s worldview evangelism look like?
The Apostle Paul at Athens (Acts 17:16-34): A Model of Worldview
Evangelism
I will be framing the rest of my talk around three points: Paul’s
Place, Paul’s Presentation, and Paul’s Proclamation.
Paul’s Place: Hostile Territory
In addition to the fact that these Athenians have no biblical
worldview, three features of this culture are striking. What were
some of the unique contextual factors found in this
place?
2
First, we know that during this time period, the Roman Empire was
able to control much of their conquered lands and people through a
government-endorsed and government-protected
religious pluralism.
The Romans insightfully knew that a newly subjugated people were
less likely to revolt if they quickly adopted into the Roman
religious system the gods of the conquered people. But they also
insisted that these new subjects must adopt into their religious
system the Roman gods. In this way, their religious values and
principles, their “worldview,” would be modified and mitigated.
Second, Paul knew that the people to whom he was witnessing were not
blank slates that needed a religious system to make sense of their
world and lives. They endorsed, exemplified, and argued for various
powerful and
competing worldviews. Paul specifically addresses those
in his audience that held to two of those worldviews: Epicureanism
and Stoicism. We have to remember that in this place that Paul finds
himself, these are not just philosophies to discuss at a university
setting, but are rigorous systems that governed the Athenians’
thoughts and lives. It was a way of life,, a religion. So, what is
happening here is that Paul is not just giving the Athenians
something they didn’t have, namely, a self-consistent religious
system, but he is offering them a competing worldview.
2
I am indebted to D.A. Carson’s, “Athens Revisited,” (
Telling the Truth
[Zondervan, 2000], 389-98), and Jay Wegter’s conference talk, “The Power of the Christian Worldview in Pagan Evangelism,”
CWiPPThink 2007, for much of this material.
<< Previous Page
| 1
2
3
4 5
|
Next
Page >>